View point score
Summer 2025 · U-15
| Team | Played | Wins | Draws | Losses | Forfeits | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Gunnamatta Tiger Sharks | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 22 | 25 | 22 | 96% |
| 2. Arctic Trigger Bears | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 40 | 38 | 2 | 19 | 79% |
| 3. Arctic Polar Bears | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 42 | 31 | 11 | 18 | 78% |
| 4. Gunnamatta Basking Sharks | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 31 | 1 | 15 | 68% |
| 5. Gunnamatta Hammerhead Sharks | 8 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 47 | 40 | 7 | 16 | 67% |
| 6. Dharawal Crays U-15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 28 | 49 | -21 | 13 | 57% |
| 7. Gunnamatta Mako Sharks | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 33 | 38 | -5 | 12 | 52% |
| 8. Gunnamatta Leopard Sharks | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 32 | -9 | 12 | 52% |
| 9. Gunnamatta Whale Sharks | 7 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 36 | -11 | 11 | 48% |
The point score is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
point scores. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
Sponsors
